Pirated versions of Microsoft's Windows XP computer operating system have flooded Beijing's computer market, the local press reported, just days before its official launch in China.
Copies of Microsoft's latest product labelled "officially copyrighted" were freely available at the Zhongguancun computer market for about 30 yuan (£2.45; $3.60), the Beijing Evening News said.
Microsoft will launch a "simplified Chinese" version of Windows XP on Thursday with a price tag of 1,498 yuan (£123; $180).
Microsoft officials warned that the pirated versions were of sample versions and their use could cause damage to computers, the report said.
A number of a software manufacturers were also using the XP brand, with products called "Oriental Dadian XP" and "Jingying 315XP", to promote their sales, it said.
Piracy problem
Microsoft sold out of copies Windows XP within two hours of its official launch in Hong Kong last week, the company claimed, but copies of English and Chinese versions of Windows XP were already available in many shopping malls.
"The piracy problem is very serious for the local software industry but the Hong Kong Government should be congratulated for their efforts," Mark Phibbs, Microsoft general manager of business development for Asia said last week.
A recent report for industry body Business Software Alliance found China ranked second for software piracy after Vietnam.
The report valued the losses last year in China due to software piracy at $1.12bn, almost double those in 1999.
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1637685.stm
FBI weighs into anti-piracy fight
CDs, DVDs, and video games in the US are to get an FBI seal in an attempt to deter people from copying them.
The new labels warn consumers that criminal copyright infringement could land them with a $250,000 (£133,000) fine and five years in prison.
They each carry the seal of the FBI, which says piracy is now its third biggest priority behind terrorism and counter-intelligence.
US entertainment firms says they are losing billions of dollars to piracy. "The theft of copyrighted material has grown substantially and has had a detrimental impact on the US economy, said the assistant director of the FBI's cyber division, Jana Monroe. The FBI said it was up to individual companies whether the label appeared on the packaging, or on screen.
The full warning reads: "The unauthorised reproduction or distribution of this copyrighted work is illegal.
"Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to five years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000."
The label has the backing of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), and two groups representing the software industry, the Entertainment Software Association and the Software and Information Industry Association.
RIAA executive vice president Brad Buckles said: "As the seal attests, these are serious crimes with serious consequences - including federal prosecution - to making unauthorised copies or uploading music without permission, and consumers should be aware of them."
Last year the RIAA filed hundreds of lawsuits through the US courts against individuals it accused of swapping music online.
MPAA senior vice president Ken Jacobsen said the film industry was losing $3.5bn (£1.86bn) each year through piracy, before copying via the internet was taken into account.
"With hundreds of thousands of jobs at stake nationwide, piracy is a serious threat to the entire entertainment industry," he said.
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3506301.stm
The new labels warn consumers that criminal copyright infringement could land them with a $250,000 (£133,000) fine and five years in prison.
They each carry the seal of the FBI, which says piracy is now its third biggest priority behind terrorism and counter-intelligence.
US entertainment firms says they are losing billions of dollars to piracy. "The theft of copyrighted material has grown substantially and has had a detrimental impact on the US economy, said the assistant director of the FBI's cyber division, Jana Monroe. The FBI said it was up to individual companies whether the label appeared on the packaging, or on screen.
The full warning reads: "The unauthorised reproduction or distribution of this copyrighted work is illegal.
"Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to five years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000."
The label has the backing of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), and two groups representing the software industry, the Entertainment Software Association and the Software and Information Industry Association.
RIAA executive vice president Brad Buckles said: "As the seal attests, these are serious crimes with serious consequences - including federal prosecution - to making unauthorised copies or uploading music without permission, and consumers should be aware of them."
Last year the RIAA filed hundreds of lawsuits through the US courts against individuals it accused of swapping music online.
MPAA senior vice president Ken Jacobsen said the film industry was losing $3.5bn (£1.86bn) each year through piracy, before copying via the internet was taken into account.
"With hundreds of thousands of jobs at stake nationwide, piracy is a serious threat to the entire entertainment industry," he said.
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3506301.stm
Posted by
Maryam Hajikhani
0
comments
How cyber piracy affects you
The temptation is great: simply copy a program to CD and hey presto, software for free. The perfect crime where Bill Gates is the only victim, right? Not quite - the implications could be closer to home than people expect.
"Copying software is so easy, of course I've done it," says Matthew, a London-based IT specialist. "That was in my undergraduate years - I didn't know anyone who bought the stuff legitimately.
"Someone would turn up and say 'give this a crack, it's the latest version' and it'd get passed around until it was obsolete. It was mostly office and spreadsheet programs, the kind of stuff you can download from the web now."
After graduation, Matthew used a mix of licensed and copied software until 1998. "On holiday in Malaysia, I bought a copy of Microsoft's FrontPage from a guy at a dodgy market stall. For months it worked fine, but it turned out to be laced with the Chernobyl virus - it cost £600 to repair the damage."
His fingers well and truly burned - and his spending power far greater than in his student years - Matthew now only uses licensed software. "Not only do they work properly, I get all the technical support and upgrades I need.
"I think Microsoft and other big firms benefited from that early piracy by my generation. Yes we saved money, but we became much more computer literate and so are now regular customers. I bought a photo editing program last year - I wouldn't have been interested if I hadn't tried out a bootleg copy years ago."
Rip roaring trade
As Matthew discovered, illegal copies cost more than industry fat cats dear. New estimates find the industry is losing more than $10bn a year from pirated desktop software.
Piracy is at its most widespread in the Far East, where nine in 10 packages used are unlicensed copies, with Eastern Europe fast catching up.
A "pirate" can range from a student with a recordable CD drive, to a home user who trawls the net for illegal software; from a company which buys one copy of a program then uses it on several computers, to a dealer selling counterfeit packages. Organised crime rings are partly funded by counterfeiting.
For software companies, piracy means lost revenue, which in turn means fewer jobs, scaled-back operations and less tax for the public purse.
For users, counterfeit software may be a false economy. The program may contain a virus or be incomplete; and the user will have no entitlement to future upgrades.
For businesses, there's the threat of legal action and hefty fines - Microsoft, for instance, has been criticised for tackling charities which bought copied software in good faith - and even professional embarrassment. Under a new EU directive, organisations caught out may have to apologise in print as well as face fines.
Increasingly, innocent users are being "taken in" because of the difficulty of spotting counterfeit software. Victims have included Special Branch - the UK's anti-terrorism police - and Clackmannanshire Council in Scotland, which inadvertently bought fake product licences and had to pay £150,000 for new licences and legal costs.
In 2000 alone, the software industry in Europe lost $3bn to pirates. This is thought to be only a tiny fraction of the copying carried out every day on the internet.
The watchdog organisation, Business Software Alliance, says this is unacceptable for an industry that commits millions of pounds to research and development, and in recent years has contributed six times as much to Europe's GDP as the consumer goods industry.
"Because software is so valuable, and because computers make it easy to create an exact copy of a program in seconds, software piracy is widespread. Piracy exists in homes, schools, businesses and government," says a BSA spokesman.
Cheap and legal?
And it has shaped the nature of the industry. If Russia, for instance, cracked down on piracy, it would have more legitimate software companies. Instead it has become an enclave for pirated software.
If the pirates were stopped, it might just benefit the consumer. With more companies investing in new products, competition would increase and in turn prices could fall.
To this end, the EU and the UK Government have brought in tougher measures to curb copyright and trademark abuse. That's not to say these measures will be widely enforced. And as the EU expands, it takes time for new member countries to match its intellectual property laws.
The industry itself must help tackle the problem, says the Federation against Software Theft. Yet in the past, companies which made hard-to-copy software found sales suffered as users got fed up with the security measures involved.
The real challenge remains: how do you convince someone to pay £800 for a CD when they can easily pick up an exact copy for 80p?[1].
Source: [1] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2924531.stm
"Copying software is so easy, of course I've done it," says Matthew, a London-based IT specialist. "That was in my undergraduate years - I didn't know anyone who bought the stuff legitimately.
"Someone would turn up and say 'give this a crack, it's the latest version' and it'd get passed around until it was obsolete. It was mostly office and spreadsheet programs, the kind of stuff you can download from the web now."
After graduation, Matthew used a mix of licensed and copied software until 1998. "On holiday in Malaysia, I bought a copy of Microsoft's FrontPage from a guy at a dodgy market stall. For months it worked fine, but it turned out to be laced with the Chernobyl virus - it cost £600 to repair the damage."
His fingers well and truly burned - and his spending power far greater than in his student years - Matthew now only uses licensed software. "Not only do they work properly, I get all the technical support and upgrades I need.
"I think Microsoft and other big firms benefited from that early piracy by my generation. Yes we saved money, but we became much more computer literate and so are now regular customers. I bought a photo editing program last year - I wouldn't have been interested if I hadn't tried out a bootleg copy years ago."
Rip roaring trade
As Matthew discovered, illegal copies cost more than industry fat cats dear. New estimates find the industry is losing more than $10bn a year from pirated desktop software.
Piracy is at its most widespread in the Far East, where nine in 10 packages used are unlicensed copies, with Eastern Europe fast catching up.
A "pirate" can range from a student with a recordable CD drive, to a home user who trawls the net for illegal software; from a company which buys one copy of a program then uses it on several computers, to a dealer selling counterfeit packages. Organised crime rings are partly funded by counterfeiting.
For software companies, piracy means lost revenue, which in turn means fewer jobs, scaled-back operations and less tax for the public purse.
For users, counterfeit software may be a false economy. The program may contain a virus or be incomplete; and the user will have no entitlement to future upgrades.
For businesses, there's the threat of legal action and hefty fines - Microsoft, for instance, has been criticised for tackling charities which bought copied software in good faith - and even professional embarrassment. Under a new EU directive, organisations caught out may have to apologise in print as well as face fines.
Increasingly, innocent users are being "taken in" because of the difficulty of spotting counterfeit software. Victims have included Special Branch - the UK's anti-terrorism police - and Clackmannanshire Council in Scotland, which inadvertently bought fake product licences and had to pay £150,000 for new licences and legal costs.
In 2000 alone, the software industry in Europe lost $3bn to pirates. This is thought to be only a tiny fraction of the copying carried out every day on the internet.
The watchdog organisation, Business Software Alliance, says this is unacceptable for an industry that commits millions of pounds to research and development, and in recent years has contributed six times as much to Europe's GDP as the consumer goods industry.
"Because software is so valuable, and because computers make it easy to create an exact copy of a program in seconds, software piracy is widespread. Piracy exists in homes, schools, businesses and government," says a BSA spokesman.
Cheap and legal?
And it has shaped the nature of the industry. If Russia, for instance, cracked down on piracy, it would have more legitimate software companies. Instead it has become an enclave for pirated software.
If the pirates were stopped, it might just benefit the consumer. With more companies investing in new products, competition would increase and in turn prices could fall.
To this end, the EU and the UK Government have brought in tougher measures to curb copyright and trademark abuse. That's not to say these measures will be widely enforced. And as the EU expands, it takes time for new member countries to match its intellectual property laws.
The industry itself must help tackle the problem, says the Federation against Software Theft. Yet in the past, companies which made hard-to-copy software found sales suffered as users got fed up with the security measures involved.
The real challenge remains: how do you convince someone to pay £800 for a CD when they can easily pick up an exact copy for 80p?[1].
Source: [1] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2924531.stm
Posted by
Maryam Hajikhani
1 comments
What is Cyber Piracy and Why Should Legal Aid Care?
If a for-profit company listed themselves as the Legal Aid Society of Your Organization in your city's phone book, you would know how to react and would do so to protect your client community. Cyber Piracy involves similar deceptive practices, but uses the world wide web as its advertising source.
Recent studies by Pew Internet & American Life Project on low-income use of the Internet show that as of 2004, nearly half of low-income households had easy access to the Internet at home or work. (See: Digital Divide Quiz: Test your Knowledge of Client Use of Internet.) With more clients finding legal help online, legal aid programs have an opportunity to reach more people to promote its services or deliver information. Herein lies the threat.
Cyber piracy involves various deceptive practices that companies or individuals engage in to profit from online users. Within the legal aid community, these deceptive practices result in confusion for the public (particularly clients and potential clients) as well as take advantage of the good-will and reputation of legal aid organizations. Without a system to address cyber piracy, legal aid programs risk the chance that the public, especially unsophisticated online users, will not reach legitimate legal aid website and will be confused and possibly extorted on websites posing as legal aid.
Within the legal aid community, cyber piracy is a recent but growing problem. Today over fifty states and territories have launched statewide websites through LSC funding. In addition, hundreds of individual LSC and IOLTA funded programs maintain a program website that utilizes there organization’s name in the URL. These websites spend substantial time and effort providing content for and reaching out to low-income communities. As these websites grow in use and popularity, they become more and more likely target for these practices and the potential for harm to the client population and organizations increases.
There are a variety of practices within the term “cyber piracy” which may include cyber squatting, domain parking, and/or deceptive ad-word use. Each presents a unique challenge for a legal aid program that may lack the time, knowledge and resources to adequately pursue a resolution to these issues.
Legal Aid programs are vulnerable to predatory practices by companies because few programs have their names trademarked. In fact, many programs use generic, descriptive names to describe their program, which may be hard to trademark.
Legal aid programs need to know how cyber piracy is affecting their organization (see NTAP's Research to find out how your program fares online), know the practical steps you can take to protect your organization and clients, and know how to fight cyber piracy[1].
Source: [1] http://lsntap.org/CyberPiracy_Why_Care
Recent studies by Pew Internet & American Life Project on low-income use of the Internet show that as of 2004, nearly half of low-income households had easy access to the Internet at home or work. (See: Digital Divide Quiz: Test your Knowledge of Client Use of Internet.) With more clients finding legal help online, legal aid programs have an opportunity to reach more people to promote its services or deliver information. Herein lies the threat.
Cyber piracy involves various deceptive practices that companies or individuals engage in to profit from online users. Within the legal aid community, these deceptive practices result in confusion for the public (particularly clients and potential clients) as well as take advantage of the good-will and reputation of legal aid organizations. Without a system to address cyber piracy, legal aid programs risk the chance that the public, especially unsophisticated online users, will not reach legitimate legal aid website and will be confused and possibly extorted on websites posing as legal aid.
Within the legal aid community, cyber piracy is a recent but growing problem. Today over fifty states and territories have launched statewide websites through LSC funding. In addition, hundreds of individual LSC and IOLTA funded programs maintain a program website that utilizes there organization’s name in the URL. These websites spend substantial time and effort providing content for and reaching out to low-income communities. As these websites grow in use and popularity, they become more and more likely target for these practices and the potential for harm to the client population and organizations increases.
There are a variety of practices within the term “cyber piracy” which may include cyber squatting, domain parking, and/or deceptive ad-word use. Each presents a unique challenge for a legal aid program that may lack the time, knowledge and resources to adequately pursue a resolution to these issues.
Legal Aid programs are vulnerable to predatory practices by companies because few programs have their names trademarked. In fact, many programs use generic, descriptive names to describe their program, which may be hard to trademark.
Legal aid programs need to know how cyber piracy is affecting their organization (see NTAP's Research to find out how your program fares online), know the practical steps you can take to protect your organization and clients, and know how to fight cyber piracy[1].
Source: [1] http://lsntap.org/CyberPiracy_Why_Care
Posted by
Maryam Hajikhani
1 comments
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)